This is an interesting comparison of web/database frameworks. It’s admittedly not apples-to-apples, but they found a bigger spread than I would have suspected.
I tried Cake for a week and didn’t like it much, but I didn’t suspect it had performance that bad.
If you follow the links, ignore the actual data in the first one. The second one has revised numbers. However, the qualitative analysis for the first one mostly holds up.
No Perl frameworks?
Originally shared by Marcin Antkiewicz
Framework benchmarks for your cool coding needs:
http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/03/28/framework-benchmarks/
http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/04/05/frameworks-round-2/
http://www.techempower.com/blog/2013/03/28/framework-benchmarks/
Curious what you didn’t like about Cake, or what you do like about other frameworks. It’s the best php framework I’ve found, with lots of intellectual overlap from Rails. As for performance, one of our apps gets 15M hits/mo (6/sec avg, 20/sec peak) which peaks 20% cpu on an EC2-small so I can’t complain.
Now that I look a little closer, I see nginx/php-fpm/apc whereas my rig is apache-mod_php/apc. I wonder if that accounts for the difference.
assembler > c > java > ruby… where’s spring-hibernate 😉